8/30/2023 0 Comments Mac os x 10.5PC" ad, which had taken full advantage of the bad press following Vista's release. When 10.5 was finally released to the public, it had the most impressive array of features yet and complemented Apple's new "Mac vs. ![]() Even then, 10.5 "Leopard" would not be released until that fall in October-9 months after Windows Vista and 2 years after the original discussion. Leopard again was announced, this time as a full beta, on June 11 at the WWDC 2007-one year after the original announcement. Conversely, Microsoft's project "Longhorn", however, finally was completed as Windows Vista on November 8, 2006, and by January 30 of that next year had shipped. Apple's former CEO Steve Jobs first mentioned a next OS X release after Tiger in 2005, but announced Leopard on August 7 at the WWDC 2006, targeting a Spring 2007 release that never occurred. The first, however, is because it holds the longest record between Mac OS X releases, and outside of the Intel transition may be what contributed to the longest update cycle yet in 10.4 "Tiger", (though this is only speculation and is debatable). Leopard, however, is very significant to Apple Mac OS X history for numerous reasons. With the release of "Tiger", Apple had become aware of Microsoft's plans for a next-generation version of Windows codenamed "Longhorn" at the time, and pushed forward with several revolutionary desktop features, and began to market Mac OS X as "the world's most advanced operating system". But even without these fixes, 10.5.5 brings welcome improvements to the table, and it seems to do so without any obvious downsides.Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard" is a version of Mac OS X. There are, of course, still some annoying problems I hope are fixed in 10.5.6-the aforementioned Automator/iCal issue and the ability (which we had in 10.4) to add more columns to Spotlight’s results view are the two at the top of my list. Overall, OS X 10.5.5 seems like a solid mid-lifecycle product release. OpenSSH and is used to securely connect to other hosts, jumps from version 4.7p1 to 5.1p1, bringing it up-to-date with the latest available release. While most of these are minor updates-the version number on php, for instance, didn’t change, but the new version was created two hours later than was my existing version-some are more notable. Many of the updates were for printing applications ( lp, lpstat, etc.) and network applications ( dig, nslookup, and so on.). There were also quite a few non-X11 Unix commands updated in 10.5.5. The version number has climbed from 2.11 to 2.15, and many of the X11 utilities (in /usr -> X11 -> bin) appear to have been updated as well. X11 X Window System (which allows you to run X11-based applications in OS X). One relatively major change not covered in the update notes is a new version of the Unfortunately, Apple doesn’t offer a less-expensive version for those of us with “only” a few Macs in the house. If you liked those extra buttons, you’ll have to shell out $299 for a 10-machine version ofĪpple Remote Desktop 3. The section on enabling the Bonjour browser still works, but the ability to add more buttons to the toolbar has been removed. Sadly, that’s not the only hint that’s broken in OS X 10.5.5-a tip forĪdding more power to 10.5’s screen sharing is now only partially functional. Sadly, while some Automator workflows were updated (mainly those dealing with PDFs), the bug that broke theĬreate iCal events from anywhere hint is still present that oh-so-useful workflow still won’t work when used outside Automator in 10.5.5. Most of these, however, were quite minor-for example, it seems that Dictionary has been given some new words, and the workflows in the PDF Services folder have been updated. So what else did Apple update that it didn’t feel like talking about in its update notes? I noticed quite a few undocumented changes while browsing the upate’s bom file (a file that lists all files installed by the installer in 10.5, you’ll find them in /Library -> Receipts -> boms). While Apple has occasionally had trouble with previous system updates, this one seems to be trouble-free, at least thus far. ![]() If there’s a fundamental issue in 10.5.5, though, I’ve yet to run across it. I’m certain, however, that someone out there has had issues with the update-it’s almost a certainty, given the huge number and variety of Macs out there. I’ve upgraded four machines now, ranging from my aging-but-still-beloved 12-inch PowerBook G4 up to my Quad-core Mac Pro, and I’ve yet to experience so much as a hiccup. In a word, my experience thus far could be best described as uneventful-and with something like an OS upgrade, that’s a good thing. First, for those sitting on the fence waiting for user reports, I’m sure you’d like to know how well OS X 10.5.5 works.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |